IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v38y2018i6p719-729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Real-World Drug Effectiveness Prelaunch: Case Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Author

Listed:
  • Eva-Maria Didden

    (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland)

  • Yann Ruffieux

    (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland)

  • Noemi Hummel

    (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland)

  • Orestis Efthimiou

    (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece)

  • Stephan Reichenbach

    (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland)

  • Sandro Gsteiger

    (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., MORSE—Health Technology Assessment Group, Basel, Switzerland)

  • Axel Finckh

    (University Hospital of Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Christine Fletcher

    (Amgen Ltd, Cambridge, Great Britain, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK)

  • Georgia Salanti

    (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece)

  • Matthias Egger

    (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland)

Abstract

Background. Decision makers often need to assess the real-world effectiveness of new drugs prelaunch, when phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but no other data are available. Objective. To develop a method to predict drug effectiveness prelaunch and to apply it in a case study in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. The approach 1) identifies a market-approved treatment ( S ) currently used in a target population similar to that of the new drug ( N ); 2) quantifies the impact of treatment, prognostic factors, and effect modifiers on clinical outcome; 3) determines the characteristics of patients likely to receive N in routine care; and 4) predicts treatment outcome in simulated patients with these characteristics. Sources of evidence include expert opinion, RCTs, and observational studies. The framework relies on generalized linear models. Results. The case study assessed the effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ), a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), combined with conventional DMARDs, compared to conventional DMARDs alone. Rituximab (RTX) combined with conventional DMARDs was identified as treatment S. Individual participant data from 2 RCTs and 2 national registries were analyzed. The model predicted the 6-month changes in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) accurately: the mean change was -2.101 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.494) in the simulated patients receiving TCZ and conventional DMARDs compared to -1.873 (SD = 1.220) in retrospectively assessed observational data. It was -0.792 (SD = 1.499) in registry patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Conclusion. The approach performed well in the RA case study, but further work is required to better define its strengths and limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva-Maria Didden & Yann Ruffieux & Noemi Hummel & Orestis Efthimiou & Stephan Reichenbach & Sandro Gsteiger & Axel Finckh & Christine Fletcher & Georgia Salanti & Matthias Egger, 2018. "Prediction of Real-World Drug Effectiveness Prelaunch: Case Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(6), pages 719-729, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:6:p:719-729
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18775975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X18775975
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X18775975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:6:p:719-729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.