IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v38y2018i5p547-561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Infections in the Acute Care Setting

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Broniatowski

    (Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA)

  • Eili Y. Klein

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
    Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, & Policy, Washington, DC, USA)

  • Larissa May

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA)

  • Elena M. Martinez

    (Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, & Policy, Washington, DC, USA)

  • Chelsea Ware

    (Department of Medicine, The GW Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC, USA)

  • Valerie F. Reyna

    (Departments of Human Development and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research and Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA)

Abstract

Reducing inappropriate prescribing is key to mitigating antibiotic resistance, particularly in acute care settings. Clinicians’ prescribing decisions are influenced by their judgments and actual or perceived patient expectations. Fuzzy trace theory predicts that patients and clinicians base such decisions on categorical gist representations that reflect the bottom-line understanding of information about antibiotics. However, due to clinicians’ specialized training, the categorical gists driving clinicians’ and patients’ decisions might differ, which could result in mismatched expectations and inefficiencies in targeting interventions. We surveyed clinicians and patients from 2 large urban academic hospital emergency departments (EDs) and a sample of nonpatient subjects regarding their gist representations of antibiotic decisions, as well as relevant knowledge and expectations. Results were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multifactor regression. In total, 149 clinicians (47% female; 74% white), 519 online subjects (45% female; 78% white), and 225 ED patients (61% female; 56% black) completed the survey. While clinicians demonstrated greater knowledge of antibiotics and concern about side effects than patients, the predominant categorical gist for both patients and clinicians was “why not take a risk,†which compares the status quo of remaining sick to the possibility of benefit from antibiotics. This gist also predicted expectations and prior prescribing in the nonpatient sample. Other representations reflected the gist that “germs are germs†conflating bacteria and viruses, as well as perceptions of side effects and efficacy. Although individually rational, reliance on the “why not take a risk†representation can lead to socially suboptimal results, including antibiotic resistance and individual patient harm due to adverse events. Changing this representation could alter clinicians’ and patients’ expectations, suggesting opportunities to reduce overprescribing.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Broniatowski & Eili Y. Klein & Larissa May & Elena M. Martinez & Chelsea Ware & Valerie F. Reyna, 2018. "Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Infections in the Acute Care Setting," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(5), pages 547-561, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:5:p:547-561
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18770664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X18770664
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X18770664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Allen & Dorte Gyrd-Hansen & Søren Rud Kristensen & Anne Sophie Oxholm & Line Bjørnskov Pedersen & Mario Pezzino, 2022. "Physicians under Pressure: Evidence from Antibiotics Prescribing in England," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(3), pages 303-312, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:5:p:547-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.