IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v38y2018i4p452-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Matching Microsimulation Risk Factor Correlations to Cross-sectional Data: The Shortest Distance Method

Author

Listed:
  • Sze-chuan Suen

    (Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA)

  • Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert

    (Stanford Health Policy, Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA)

  • Sanjay Basu

    (Stanford Health Policy, Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA)

Abstract

Background. Microsimulation models often compute the distribution of a simulated cohort’s risk factors and medical outcomes over time using repeated waves of cross-sectional data. We sought to develop a strategy to simulate how risk factor values remain correlated over time within individuals, and compare it to available alternative methods. Methods. We developed a method using shortest-distance matching for modeling changes in risk factors in individuals over time, which preserves both the cohort distribution of each risk factor as well as the cross-sectional correlation between risk factors observed in repeated cross-sectional data. We compared the performance of the method with rank stability and regression methods, using both synthetic data and data from the Framingham Offspring Heart Study (FOHS) to simulate a cohort’s atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Results. The correlation between risk factors was better preserved using the shortest distance method than with rank stability or regression (root mean squared difference = 0.077 with shortest distance, v. 0.126 with rank stability and 0.146 with regression in FOHS, and 0.052, 0.426 and 0.352, respectively, in the synthetic data). The shortest distance method generated population ASCVD risk estimate distributions indistinguishable from the true distribution in over 99.8% of cases (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, P > 0.05), outperforming some existing regression methods, which produced ASCVD distributions statistically distinguishable from the true one at the 5% level around 15% of the time. Limitations. None of the methods considered could predict individual longitudinal trends without error. The shortest-distance method was not statistically inferior to rank stability or regression methods for predicting individual risk factor values over time in the FOHS. Conclusions. A shortest distance method may assist in preserving risk factor correlations in microsimulations informed by cross-sectional data.

Suggested Citation

  • Sze-chuan Suen & Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert & Sanjay Basu, 2018. "Matching Microsimulation Risk Factor Correlations to Cross-sectional Data: The Shortest Distance Method," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(4), pages 452-464, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:4:p:452-464
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17741635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X17741635
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X17741635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:4:p:452-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.