IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v38y2018i1_supplp9s-23s.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Jeanne S. Mandelblatt

    (Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA)

  • Aimee M. Near

    (Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA)

  • Diana L. Miglioretti

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, UC Davis School of Medicine, Davis, California, USA and Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA and Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA, USA)

  • Diego Munoz

    (Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA)

  • Brian L. Sprague

    (Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA)

  • Amy Trentham-Dietz

    (Department of Population Health Sciences and Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA)

  • Ronald Gangnon

    (Department of Population Health Sciences and Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics and Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA)

  • Allison W. Kurian

    (Departments of Medicine and Health Research & Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA)

  • Harald Weedon-Fekjaer

    (Oslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology [OCBE], Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway)

  • Kathleen A. Cronin

    (Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA)

  • Sylvia K. Plevritis

    (Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA)

Abstract

Background. Since their inception in 2000, the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) breast cancer models have collaborated to use a nationally representative core of common input parameters to represent key components of breast cancer control in each model. Employment of common inputs permits greater ability to compare model output than when each model begins with different input parameters. The use of common inputs also enhances inferences about the results, and provides a range of reasonable results based on variations in model structure, assumptions, and methods of use of the input values. The common input data are updated for each analysis to ensure that they reflect the most current practice and knowledge about breast cancer. The common core of parameters includes population rates of births and deaths; age- and cohort-specific temporal rates of breast cancer incidence in the absence of screening and treatment; effects of risk factors on incidence trends; dissemination of plain film and digital mammography; screening test performance characteristics; stage or size distribution of screen-, interval-, and clinically- detected tumors by age; the joint distribution of ER/HER2 by age and stage; survival in the absence of screening and treatment by stage and molecular subtype; age-, stage-, and molecular subtype-specific therapy; dissemination and effectiveness of therapies over time; and competing non-breast cancer mortality. Method and Results. In this paper, we summarize the methods and results for the common input values presently used in the CISNET breast cancer models, note assumptions made because of unobservable phenomena and/or unavailable data, and highlight plans for the development of future parameters. Conclusion. These data are intended to enhance the transparency of the breast CISNET models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeanne S. Mandelblatt & Aimee M. Near & Diana L. Miglioretti & Diego Munoz & Brian L. Sprague & Amy Trentham-Dietz & Ronald Gangnon & Allison W. Kurian & Harald Weedon-Fekjaer & Kathleen A. Cronin & S, 2018. "Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer Modeling," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1_suppl), pages 9-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:1_suppl:p:9s-23s
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17700624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X17700624
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X17700624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Hajjar & Oguzhan Alagoz, 2023. "Personalized Disease Screening Decisions Considering a Chronic Condition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 260-282, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:1_suppl:p:9s-23s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.