IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v37y2017i2p234-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment for Venous Thromboembolism in Chemotherapy-Treated Ambulatory Cancer Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Patrizia Ferroni
  • Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
  • Noemi Scarpato
  • Silvia Riondino
  • Umberto Nanni
  • Mario Roselli
  • Fiorella Guadagni

Abstract

Objective. To design a precision medicine approach aimed at exploiting significant patterns in data, in order to produce venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk predictors for cancer outpatients that might be of advantage over the currently recommended model (Khorana score). Design: Multiple kernel learning (MKL) based on support vector machines and random optimization (RO) models were used to produce VTE risk predictors (referred to as machine learning [ML]-RO) yielding the best classification performance over a training (3-fold cross-validation) and testing set. Results. Attributes of the patient data set ( n = 1179) were clustered into 9 groups according to clinical significance. Our analysis produced 6 ML-RO models in the training set, which yielded better likelihood ratios (LRs) than baseline models. Of interest, the most significant LRs were observed in 2 ML-RO approaches not including the Khorana score (ML-RO-2: positive likelihood ratio [+LR] = 1.68, negative likelihood ratio [–LR] = 0.24; ML-RO-3: +LR = 1.64, –LR = 0.37). The enhanced performance of ML-RO approaches over the Khorana score was further confirmed by the analysis of the areas under the Precision-Recall curve (AUCPR), and the approaches were superior in the ML-RO approaches (best performances: ML-RO-2: AUCPR = 0.212; ML-RO-3-K: AUCPR = 0.146) compared with the Khorana score (AUCPR = 0.096). Of interest, the best-fitting model was ML-RO-2, in which blood lipids and body mass index/performance status retained the strongest weights, with a weaker association with tumor site/stage and drugs. Conclusions. Although the monocentric validation of the presented predictors might represent a limitation, these results demonstrate that a model based on MKL and RO may represent a novel methodological approach to derive VTE risk classifiers. Moreover, this study highlights the advantages of optimizing the relative importance of groups of clinical attributes in the selection of VTE risk predictors.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrizia Ferroni & Fabio Massimo Zanzotto & Noemi Scarpato & Silvia Riondino & Umberto Nanni & Mario Roselli & Fiorella Guadagni, 2017. "Risk Assessment for Venous Thromboembolism in Chemotherapy-Treated Ambulatory Cancer Patients," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(2), pages 234-242, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:2:p:234-242
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X16662654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X16662654
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X16662654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:2:p:234-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.