IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v37y2017i1p79-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the Decision-Making Process for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Louise L. Beryl
  • Katharine A. S. Rendle
  • Meghan C. Halley
  • Katherine A. Gillespie
  • Suepattra G. May
  • Jennifer Glover
  • Peter Yu
  • Runi Chattopadhyay
  • Dominick L. Frosch

Abstract

Background . Studies show adjuvant endocrine therapy increases survival and decreases risk of breast cancer recurrence for hormone receptor–positive tumors. Yet studies also suggest that adherence rates among women taking this therapy may be as low as 50% owing largely to adverse side effects. Despite these rates, research on longitudinal patient decision making regarding this therapy is scant. Objective . We sought to map the decision-making process for women considering and initiating adjuvant endocrine therapy, paying particular attention to patterns of uncertainty and decisional change over time. Methods . A longitudinal series of semistructured interviews conducted at a multispecialty health care organization in Northern California with 35 newly diagnosed patients eligible for adjuvant endocrine therapy were analyzed. Analysis led to the identification and indexing of 3 new decision-making constructs—decisional phase, decisional direction, and decisional resolve—which were then organized using a visual matrix and examined for patterns characterizing the decision-making process. Results . Our data reveal that most patients do not make a single, discrete decision to take or not take hormone therapy but rather traverse multiple decisional states, characterized by 1) phase, 2) direction, and 3) strength of resolve. Our analysis tracks these decisional states longitudinally using a grayscale-coded matrix. Our data show that decisional resolve wavers not just when considering therapy, as the existing concept of decisional conflict suggests, but even after initiating it, which may signal future decisions to forgo therapy. Conclusions . Adjuvant endocrine therapy, like other chronic care decisions, has a longer decision-making process and implementation period. Thus, theoretical, empirical, and clinical approaches should consider further exploring the new concept and measurement of decisional resolve, as it may help to improve subsequent medication adherence.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise L. Beryl & Katharine A. S. Rendle & Meghan C. Halley & Katherine A. Gillespie & Suepattra G. May & Jennifer Glover & Peter Yu & Runi Chattopadhyay & Dominick L. Frosch, 2017. "Mapping the Decision-Making Process for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(1), pages 79-90, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:1:p:79-90
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X16640488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X16640488
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X16640488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:1:p:79-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.