IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v35y2015i4p412-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Neglected Topic

Author

Listed:
  • J. S. Blumenthal-Barby
  • Emily Robinson
  • Scott B. Cantor
  • Aanand D. Naik
  • Heidi Voelker Russell
  • Robert J. Volk

Abstract

Costs are an important component of patients’ decision making, but a comparatively underemphasized aspect of formal shared decision making. We hypothesized that decision aids also avoid discussion of costs, despite their being tools designed to facilitate shared decision making about patient-centered outcomes. We sought to define the frequency of cost-related information and identify the common modes of presenting cost and cost-related information in the 290 decision aids catalogued in the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s Decision Aid Library Inventory (DALI) system. We found that 56% ( n = 161) of the decision aids mentioned cost in some way, but only 13% ( n = 37) gave a specific price or range of prices. We identified 9 different ways in which cost was mentioned. The most common approach was as a “pro†of one of the treatment options (e.g., “you avoid the cost of medication†). Of the 37 decision aids that gave specific prices or ranges of prices for treatment options, only 2 were about surgery decisions despite the fact that surgery decision aids were the most common. Our findings suggest that presentation of cost information in decision aids is highly variable. Evidence-based guidelines should be developed by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Emily Robinson & Scott B. Cantor & Aanand D. Naik & Heidi Voelker Russell & Robert J. Volk, 2015. "The Neglected Topic," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(4), pages 412-418, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:35:y:2015:i:4:p:412-418
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14564433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X14564433
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X14564433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:35:y:2015:i:4:p:412-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.