IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v34y2014i4p523-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing “Proper†ROCs from Ordinal Response Data Using Weighted Power Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Mossman
  • Hongying Peng

Abstract

Background. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is the standard method for describing the accuracy of diagnostic systems where the decision task involves distinguishing between 2 mutually exclusive possibilities. The popular binormal curve-fitting model usually produces ROCs that are improper in that they do not have the ever-decreasing slope required by signal detection theory. Not infrequently, binormal ROCs have visible hooks that falsely imply worse-than-chance diagnostic differentiation where the curve lies below the no-information diagonal. In this article, we present and evaluate a 2-parameter, weighted power function (WPF) model that always results in a proper ROC curve with a positive, monotonically decreasing slope. Methods. We used a computer simulation study to compare results from binormal and WPF models. Results. The WPF model produces ROC curves that are less biased and closer to the true values than are curves obtained using the binormal model. The better performance of the WPF model follows from its design constraint as a necessarily proper ROC. Conclusions. The WPF model fits a broader variety of data sets than previously published power function models while maintaining straightforward relationships among the original decision variable, specific operating points, ROC curve contours, and model parameters. Compared with other proper ROC models, the WPF model is distinctive in its simplicity, and it avoids the flaws of the conventional binormal ROC model.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Mossman & Hongying Peng, 2014. "Constructing “Proper†ROCs from Ordinal Response Data Using Weighted Power Functions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(4), pages 523-535, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:34:y:2014:i:4:p:523-535
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13503046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X13503046
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X13503046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:34:y:2014:i:4:p:523-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.