Author
Listed:
- Sharon Manne
- Deborah Kashy
- Terrance Albrecht
- Yu-Ning Wong
- Anne Lederman Flamm
- Al B. Benson III
- Suzanne M. Miller
- Linda Fleisher
- Joanne Buzaglo
- Nancy Roach
- Michael Katz
- Eric Ross
- Michael Collins
- David Poole
- Stephanie Raivitch
- Dawn M. Miller
- Tyler G. Kinzy
- Tasnuva Liu
- Neal J. Meropol
Abstract
Objective. This study used the Ottawa Decision Support Framework to evaluate a model examining associations between clinical trial knowledge, attitudinal barriers to participating in clinical trials, clinical trial self-efficacy, and clinical trial preparedness among 1256 cancer patients seen for their first outpatient consultation at a cancer center. As an exploratory aim, moderator effects for gender, race/ethnicity, education, and metastatic status on associations in the model were evaluated. Methods . Patients completed measures of cancer clinical trial knowledge, attitudinal barriers, self-efficacy, and preparedness. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to evaluate whether self-efficacy mediated the association between knowledge and barriers with preparedness. Results . The SEM explained 26% of the variance in cancer clinical trial preparedness. Self-efficacy mediated the associations between attitudinal barriers and preparedness, but self-efficacy did not mediate the knowledge-preparedness relationship. Conclusions . Findings partially support the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and suggest that assessing patients’ level of self-efficacy may be just as important as evaluating their knowledge and attitudes about cancer clinical trials.
Suggested Citation
Sharon Manne & Deborah Kashy & Terrance Albrecht & Yu-Ning Wong & Anne Lederman Flamm & Al B. Benson III & Suzanne M. Miller & Linda Fleisher & Joanne Buzaglo & Nancy Roach & Michael Katz & Eric Ross , 2014.
"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-efficacy as Predictors of Preparedness for Oncology Clinical Trials,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(4), pages 454-463, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:34:y:2014:i:4:p:454-463
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13511704
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:34:y:2014:i:4:p:454-463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.