IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v34y2014i1p116-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret M. Byrne
  • Stacey L. Tannenbaum
  • Stefan Glück
  • Judith Hurley
  • Michael Antoni

Abstract

Background . Participation in cancer clinical trials is low, particularly in racial and ethnic minorities in some cases, which has negative consequences for the generalizability for study findings. The objective of this study was to determine what factors are associated with patients’ participation or willingness to participate and whether these factors vary by race/ethnicity. Design or Methods . White, Hispanic, and black participants were obtained through the Florida cancer registry and who were diagnosed with breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer ( N = 1100). Participants were surveyed via telephone to obtain demographic information, past participation, and willingness to participate in clinical trials, as well as barriers and facilitators to participation. Logistic and Poisson regressions were performed. Results . Respondents were on average 67.4 years old, 42.7% were male, and 50.1% were married. In this population, 7.7% of respondents had participated in a clinical trial, and 36.5% stated that they would be willing to participate. In multivariate models, blacks and Hispanics were equally likely as whites to be willing to participate in cancer trials, but Hispanics were less likely to have participated, and this was especially more likely in non–English-speaking Hispanics compared with English-speaking Hispanics. Notable barriers across race/ethnicity were mistrust and lack of knowledge of clinical trials. Limitations . Cross-sectional design limits cause-and-effect conclusions. Conclusions . There are racial differences in participation rates but not in willingness to participate. We hypothesize that willingness to participate is not very high because people are uninformed about participating, particularly in non–English-speaking Hispanics. Barriers and facilitators to participation vary by race. Improved understanding of cultural differences that can be addressed by physicians may restore faith, comprehension, and acceptability of clinical trials by all patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret M. Byrne & Stacey L. Tannenbaum & Stefan Glück & Judith Hurley & Michael Antoni, 2014. "Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(1), pages 116-126, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:34:y:2014:i:1:p:116-126
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13497264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X13497264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X13497264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zandra Engelbak Nielsen & Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen, 2019. "Cancer patients’ perceptions of factors influencing their decisions on participation in clinical drug trials: A qualitative meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2443-2461, July.
    2. Margarita Echeverri & David Anderson & Anna María Nápoles & Jacqueline M. Haas & Marc E. Johnson & Friar Sergio A. Serrano, 2018. "Cancer Health Literacy and Willingness to Participate in Cancer Research and Donate Bio-Specimens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:34:y:2014:i:1:p:116-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.