IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v33y2013i8p1039-1050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the Payoff Time Framework to Carotid Artery Disease Management

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore H. Yuo
  • Mark S. Roberts
  • R. Scott Braithwaite
  • Chung-Chou H. Chang
  • Kevin L. Kraemer

Abstract

Background and Objective: Asymptomatic stenosis of the carotid arteries is associated with stroke. Carotid revascularization can reduce the future risk of stroke but can also trigger an immediate stroke. The objective was to model the generic relationship between immediate risk, long-term benefit, and life expectancy for any one-time prophylactic treatment and then apply the model to the use of revascularization in the management of asymptomatic carotid disease. Methods: In the “payoff time†framework, the possibility of losing quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) because of revascularization failure is conceptualized as an “investment†that is eventually recouped over time, on average. Using this framework, we developed simple mathematical forms that define relationships between the following: perioperative probability of stroke (P); annual stroke rate without revascularization (r 0 ); annual stroke rate after revascularization, conditional on not having suffered perioperative stroke (r 1 ); utility levels assigned to the asymptomatic state (u a ) and stroke state (u s ); and mortality rates (λ). Results: In patients whose life expectancy is below a critical life expectancy ( CLE = P ( 1 − P ) r 0 − r 1 ) , the “investment†will never pay off, and revascularization will lead to loss of QALYs, on average. CLE is independent of utilities assigned to the health states if a rank ordering exists in which u a > u s . For clinically relevant values (P = 3%, r 0 = 1%, r 1 = 0.5%), the CLE is approximately 6.4 years, which is longer than published guidelines regarding patient selection for revascularization. Conclusions: In managing asymptomatic carotid disease, the payoff time framework specifies a CLE beneath which patients, on average, will not benefit from revascularization. This formula is suitable for clinical use at the patient’s bedside and can account for patient variability, the ability of clinicians who perform revascularization, and the particular revascularization technology that is chosen.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore H. Yuo & Mark S. Roberts & R. Scott Braithwaite & Chung-Chou H. Chang & Kevin L. Kraemer, 2013. "Applying the Payoff Time Framework to Carotid Artery Disease Management," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(8), pages 1039-1050, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:8:p:1039-1050
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13491462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X13491462
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X13491462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:8:p:1039-1050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.