IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v33y2013i7p949-960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sequential Value-of-Information Assessment for Prospective Drug Safety Monitoring Using Claims Databases

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda R. Patrick
  • Jessica M. Franklin
  • Milton C. Weinstein
  • Robert J. Glynn
  • Sebastian Schneeweiss

Abstract

Background. Key to conducting active drug safety surveillance using longitudinal health care data is determining whether and when there is sufficient evidence to raise a safety alert. We propose to quantify the expected value of the information (VOI) to be gained through continued monitoring in terms of its potential to reduce health losses among future patients and weigh this against the health cost of exposing current patients during continued monitoring. Objective. To apply this sequential VOI approach to monitoring the comparative safety of prasugrel v. clopidogrel on gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Methods. We calculated expected health losses assuming expected mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal stroke on clopidogrel were 1.27, 5.93, and 1.14 per 100 person-years, using historical data; relative rates on prasugrel were 0.95, 0.76, and 1.02 based on trial data; and MI, stroke, and GI bleed were 9%, 25%, and 0.1% as bad as death, respectively. We assigned gamma prior distributions to the rates of bleeding on clopidogrel and prasugrel to capture baseline uncertainty; in Monte Carlo simulations, prasugrel’s efficacy parameters were sampled from distributions. Results. Treating all patients with prasugrel minimized expected health losses, resulting in 475.3 death-equivalents over 25,000 person-years of treatment. Monitoring increased expected losses by 5, and treating all patients with clopidogrel increased losses by 46.4. In Monte Carlo simulation, monitoring on average increased expected losses by 4.6, but a reduction in losses from monitoring was supported within the bounds of uncertainty (95% confidence interval, −0.6 to 11.1). Limitations. Patient heterogeneity and the possibility of updating efficacy parameters during monitoring were not incorporated. Conclusion. The proposed approach integrates expected health harms and benefits of continued monitoring in the decision to raise a safety alert.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda R. Patrick & Jessica M. Franklin & Milton C. Weinstein & Robert J. Glynn & Sebastian Schneeweiss, 2013. "Sequential Value-of-Information Assessment for Prospective Drug Safety Monitoring Using Claims Databases," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(7), pages 949-960, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:7:p:949-960
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13497997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X13497997
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X13497997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:7:p:949-960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.