Author
Listed:
- Michael S. Broder
- Timothy Juday
- Eunice Y. Chang
- Yonghua Jing
- Tanya G. K. Bentley
Abstract
Objective . To develop and validate a claims signature model that estimates proportions of HIV-infected patients in administrative claims databases who switched combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens because of virologic failure. Methods . The authors used an HIV-specific registry (development data set) to develop logistic regression models to estimate odds of virologic failure among patients who switched cART regimens. Models were validated in a sample of administrative claims with laboratory values (validation data set). The final model was applied to an application data set as a worked example. Results . There were 1691, 1073, and 3954 eligible patients with cART switches in the development, validation, and application data sets, respectively. In the development data set, virologic failure before a switch was observed 21.8% of the time. Failure more likely caused the regimen switch among patients who were treatment experienced, had been receiving their baseline regimen for > 180 days, had ≥ 2 or more physician visits within 90 days, had > 1 HIV RNA or CD4 cell count test within 30 days, had any resistance test within 180 days, or had a change in regimen type. The final model had good discriminatory ability (C = 0.885) and fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.8692). Failure was estimated to occur in 18.9% (v. 18.6% observed) of switches in the validation data set and 13.8% in the application data set. Conclusions . This claims signature model allows payers to use claims data to estimate virologic failure rates in their patient populations, thereby better understanding plan costs of failure.
Suggested Citation
Michael S. Broder & Timothy Juday & Eunice Y. Chang & Yonghua Jing & Tanya G. K. Bentley, 2012.
"Using Administrative Claims Data to Estimate Virologic Failure Rates among Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients with Antiretroviral Regimen Switches,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(1), pages 118-131, January.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:118-131
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11403489
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:118-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.