IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v31y2011i4p611-624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Unknown Parameters of the Natural History of Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Using Discrete-Event Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Fatih Safa Erenay
  • Oguzhan Alagoz
  • Ritesh Banerjee
  • Robert R. Cima

Abstract

Objectives . Some aspects of the natural history of metachronous colorectal cancer (MCRC), such as the rate of progression from adenomatous polyp to MCRC, are unknown. The objective of this study is to estimate a set of parameters revealing some of these unknown characteristics of MCRC. Methods . The authors developed a computer simulation model that mimics the progression of MCRC for a 5-year period following the treatment of primary colorectal cancer (CRC). They obtained the inputs of the simulation model using longitudinal data for 284 CRC patients from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Results . Five-year MCRC incidence and all-cause mortality were 7.4% and 12.7% in the patient cohort, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that 5-year MCRC incidence was associated with gender ( P = 0.05), whereas both all-cause and CRC-related mortalities were associated with age ( P

Suggested Citation

  • Fatih Safa Erenay & Oguzhan Alagoz & Ritesh Banerjee & Robert R. Cima, 2011. "Estimating the Unknown Parameters of the Natural History of Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Using Discrete-Event Simulation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(4), pages 611-624, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:4:p:611-624
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10391809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10391809
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X10391809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun Eric & Jena Anupam B & Lakdawalla Darius & Reyes Carolina & Philipson Tomas J & Goldman Dana, 2010. "The Contributions of Improved Therapy and Earlier Detection to Cancer Survival Gains, 1988-2000," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franklin, Jessica M. & Schneeweiss, Sebastian & Polinski, Jennifer M. & Rassen, Jeremy A., 2014. "Plasmode simulation for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiologic methods in complex healthcare databases," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 219-226.
    2. Fatih Safa Erenay & Oguzhan Alagoz & Adnan Said, 2014. "Optimizing Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Surveillance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 381-400, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lakdawalla, Darius N. & Sun, Eric C. & Jena, Anupam B. & Reyes, Carolina M. & Goldman, Dana P. & Philipson, Tomas J., 2010. "An economic evaluation of the war on cancer," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 333-346, May.
    2. Seabury Seth A. & Goldman Dana P. & Gupta Charu N. & Khan Zeba M. & Chandra Amitabh & Philipson Tomas J. & Lakdawalla Darius N., 2016. "Quantifying Gains in the War on Cancer Due to Improved Treatment and Earlier Detection," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 141-156, June.
    3. David H. Howard & Peter B. Bach & Ernst R. Berndt & Rena M. Conti, 2015. "Pricing in the Market for Anticancer Drugs," NBER Working Papers 20867, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Adam Leive & Thomas Stratmann, 2015. "Do national cancer screening guidelines reduce mortality?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 28(4), pages 1075-1095, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:4:p:611-624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.