IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v30y2010i3p301-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Effectiveness Research: Challenges for Medical Journals

Author

Listed:
  • Harold C. Sox

    (Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire)

  • Mark Helfand

    (Portland VA Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, helfand@ohsu.edu)

  • Jeremy Grimshaw

    (Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada)

  • Kay Dickersin

    (Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland)

  • David Tovey

    (The Cochrane Library, London, United Kingdom)

  • J. André Knottnerus

    (Department of General Practice, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Peter Tugwell

    (Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Harold C. Sox & Mark Helfand & Jeremy Grimshaw & Kay Dickersin & David Tovey & J. André Knottnerus & Peter Tugwell, 2010. "Comparative Effectiveness Research: Challenges for Medical Journals," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(3), pages 301-303, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:30:y:2010:i:3:p:301-303
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10370815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10370815
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X10370815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noémi Kreif & Richard Grieve & M. Zia Sadique, 2013. "Statistical Methods For Cost‐Effectiveness Analyses That Use Observational Data: A Critical Appraisal Tool And Review Of Current Practice," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 486-500, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:30:y:2010:i:3:p:301-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.