IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v29y2009i5p634-635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Web Exclusive White Paper Series on Diagnostic Test Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Helfand

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Helfand, 2009. "Web Exclusive White Paper Series on Diagnostic Test Evaluation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(5), pages 634-635, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:5:p:634-635
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09347099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X09347099
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X09347099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas A. Trikalinos & Uwe Siebert & Joseph Lau, 2009. "Decision-Analytic Modeling to Evaluate Benefits and Harms of Medical Tests: Uses and Limitations," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(5), pages 22-29, September.
    2. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt & Kirsten McCaffery, 2009. "Additional Patient Outcomes and Pathways in Evaluations of Testing," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(5), pages 30-38, September.
    3. Jeroen G. Lijmer & Mariska Leeflang & Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, 2009. "Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(5), pages 13-21, September.
    4. Sarah J. Lord & Les Irwig & Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, 2009. "Using the Principles of Randomized Controlled Trial Design to Guide Test Evaluation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(5), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas A. Trikalinos & Uwe Siebert & Joseph Lau, 2009. "Decision-Analytic Modeling to Evaluate Benefits and Harms of Medical Tests: Uses and Limitations," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(5), pages 22-29, September.
    2. Irmgard C. Schiller-Frühwirth & Beate Jahn & Marjan Arvandi & Uwe Siebert, 2017. "Cost-Effectiveness Models in Breast Cancer Screening in the General Population: A Systematic Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 333-351, June.
    3. Michelle M.A. Kip & Maarten J. IJzerman & Martin Henriksson & Tracy Merlin & Milton C. Weinstein & Charles E. Phelps & Ron Kusters & Hendrik Koffijberg, 2018. "Toward Alignment in the Reporting of Economic Evaluations of Diagnostic Tests and Biomarkers: The AGREEDT Checklist," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(7), pages 778-788, October.
    4. Rachel Farber & Nehmat Houssami & Isabelle Barnes & Kevin McGeechan & Alexandra Barratt & Katy J. L. Bell, 2022. "Considerations for Evaluating the Introduction of New Cancer Screening Technology: Use of Interval Cancers to Assess Potential Benefits and Harms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Alison Bray & Emmanouela Kampouraki & Amanda Winter & Aaron Jesuthasan & Ben Messer & Sara Graziadio, 2020. "High Variability in Sepsis Guidelines in UK: Why Does It Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:5:p:634-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.