IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v29y2009i4p475-482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There a Role for Decision Aids in Advanced Breast Cancer?

Author

Listed:
  • Karen R. Sepucha

    (Health Decision Research Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, ksepucha@partners.org)

  • Elissa M. Ozanne

    (Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts)

  • Ann H. Partridge

    (Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts)

  • Beverly Moy

    (Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA)

Abstract

Background . A diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (BC) forces patients and providers to make difficult treatment decisions. Objective . To pilot test a decision aid (DA) for advanced BC. Design . Pretest, posttest study. Setting . Two academic cancer centers in Boston, Massachusetts. Patients . Fifty patients diagnosed with advanced BC. Intervention . A patient DA that consisted of a 30-minute DVD and booklet. Measurements . Patients were surveyed at baseline, after the intervention, and at 3 months. Measures included use and acceptability of DA, distress, treatment goals, and preference for and actual participation in decisions. Physicians were surveyed at baseline and 3 months. Measures included treatment goals, assessment of patients' experience with treatments, and patients' preference for and actual participation in decisions. Results . Thirty-two patients (64%) enrolled and completed the baseline survey, 30 completed the postvideo survey, and 25 completed the 3-month survey. The DA was acceptable and did not increase distress. The majority desired to share decision making with their doctor. Only 38% achieved their desired level of participation. At baseline, agreement between patients and providers on the main goal of treatment (lengthen life v. relieve symptoms) was 50% ( κ = —0.045, P = 0.71), and at 3 months it was 74% ( κ = 0.125, P = 0.48). Conclusions . It is feasible to perform a clinical trial of a DA with advanced BC patients. Most participants wanted to participate in decisions about their care and found the DA acceptable. This study highlights several issues in developing and implementing DAs in this vulnerable population facing complex decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen R. Sepucha & Elissa M. Ozanne & Ann H. Partridge & Beverly Moy, 2009. "Is There a Role for Decision Aids in Advanced Breast Cancer?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(4), pages 475-482, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:4:p:475-482
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09333124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X09333124
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X09333124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:4:p:475-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.