Author
Listed:
- Andrew J. Vickers
(Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, vickersa@mskcc.org)
- Elena B. Elkin
(Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York)
- Pamela B. Peele
(Department of Health Policy & Management, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Health Plan, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)
- Maura Dickler
(Breast Cancer Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York)
- Laura A. Siminoff
(Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia)
Abstract
Purpose . Women with localized breast cancer face difficult decisions about adjuvant therapy. Several decision aids are available to help women choose between treatment options. Decision aids are known to affect treatment choices and may therefore affect patient survival. The authors aimed to model the effects of the Adjuvant! decision aid on expected survival in women with early stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods . Data were obtained from a randomized trial of Adjuvant! ( n = 395). To calculate the effects of the decision aid on survival, the authors used the Adjuvant! survival predictions as a surrogate endpoint. Data from each arm were entered separately into statistical models to estimate change in survival associated with receiving the Adjuvant! decision aid. Results . Most women ( ∼ 85%) chose a treatment option that maximized predicted survival. The effects of the decision aid on outcome could not be modeled because a small number of women ( n = 12, 3%) chose treatment options associated with a large (5%—14%) loss in survival. These women—most typically estrogen receptor positive but refusing hormonal therapy—were equally divided between Adjuvant! and control groups and were not distinguished by medical or demographic factors. Conclusions . Expected benefit from treatment is a key variable in understanding patient behavior. A small number of women refuse adjuvant treatment associated with large increases in predicted survival, even when they are explicitly informed about the degree of benefit they would forgo. Investigation of the effects of decision aids on cancer survival is unlikely to be fruitful due to power considerations.
Suggested Citation
Andrew J. Vickers & Elena B. Elkin & Pamela B. Peele & Maura Dickler & Laura A. Siminoff, 2009.
"Long-Term Health Outcomes of a Decision Aid: Data from a Randomized Trial of Adjuvant! in Women with Localized Breast Cancer,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(4), pages 461-467, July.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:4:p:461-467
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08329344
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:29:y:2009:i:4:p:461-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.