IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v28y2008i6p917-925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anxiety, Fear of Cancer, and Perceived Risk of Cancer following Lung Cancer Screening

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret M. Byrne

    (Department of Epidemiology and Public Health and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, mbyrne2@med.miami.edu)

  • Joel Weissfeld

    (Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)

  • Mark S. Roberts

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)

Abstract

Background. Lung cancer screening can result in a high rate of indeterminate findings and has not yet been proven to be efficacious in reducing mortality. To date, the psychological consequences of receiving an indeterminate screening result are not known. Methods. Four hundred individuals were recruited into this study. Participants completed 4 surveys: baseline, after lung screening results were known, and at 6 and 12 mo after screening. Demographics, state/trait anxiety, fear of cancer, and perceived risk of lung cancer were measured. Mixed-model regressions were used to determine whether the levels and time trends of outcome variables were different among individuals with different screening outcomes. Results. An indeterminate screening result increased state anxiety of participants, although anxiety then decreased over time. The objective risk of cancer is lower for individuals with an indeterminate screen than their initial perceived risk, and screening did not change their perceived risk of cancer. Those with a suspicious screening result had increased perceived risk of cancer and fear of cancer after screening, and these effects also diminished over time. Individuals with a negative screen had a temporary reduction in perceived risk of cancer. Conclu sions. Individuals who are screened for lung cancer and receive an indeterminate or suspicious screening result have some negative psychological effects from being screened. The results suggest that individuals who are considering screening should be fully informed of the risk of negative psychosocial consequences and that individuals who have been screened should receive clear and detailed information on interpreting screening results.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret M. Byrne & Joel Weissfeld & Mark S. Roberts, 2008. "Anxiety, Fear of Cancer, and Perceived Risk of Cancer following Lung Cancer Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(6), pages 917-925, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:6:p:917-925
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08322013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X08322013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X08322013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:6:p:917-925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.