Author
Listed:
- Carmen L. Lewis
(Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, lewiscl@med.unc.edu, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
- Charity G. Moore
(Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
- Carol E. Golin
(Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
- Jennifer Griffith
(Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
- Alison Tytell-Brenner
(Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
- Michael P. Pignone
(Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina)
Abstract
Background. Colon cancer screening recommendations for patients aged 75 years and older should account for variation in older adults' health states, life expectancies, and potential to benefit from screening. Purpose. To assess if resident physicians incorporate health state and life expectancy information when making recommendations about colon cancer screening for adults aged 75 years and older. Methods. Resident physicians at a university internal medicine program completed a survey in which they made life expectancy estimates and screening recommendations for hypothetical 75- and 85-year-old women patients with good, fair, or poor health states. Outcomes of interest included accuracy of residents' life expectancy estimates (compared with life table data), effect of health state and life expectancy on screening recommendations, and whether providing life table information affected the initial screening recommendation for the 85-year-old hypothetical patients. Results. Residents' life expectancy estimates demonstrated moderate agreement with life table estimates. Their recommendations for colon cancer screening for the 75-year-old patient vignettes varied appropriately by health state and by their estimates of life expectancy. Receiving information about life expectancy from life tables affected residents' recommendations for one of the three 85-year-old hypothetical patients, the woman in good health. Many resident physicians reported uncertainty about the potential to benefit from screening for each patient scenario. Conclusions. Resident physicians appropriately used life expectancy and health state to make colon cancer screening recommendations for older adults. Residents reported substantial uncertainty with regard to the potential benefit of screening.
Suggested Citation
Carmen L. Lewis & Charity G. Moore & Carol E. Golin & Jennifer Griffith & Alison Tytell-Brenner & Michael P. Pignone, 2008.
"Resident Physicians' Life Expectancy Estimates and Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations in Elderly Patients,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(2), pages 254-261, March.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:2:p:254-261
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07311756
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:2:p:254-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.