IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v28y2008i2p243-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Determine Inventory Size for a National Cord Blood Bank

Author

Listed:
  • David H. Howard

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, david.howard@emory.edu)

  • David Meltzer

    (Department of Medicine, Department of Economics, Graduate School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois)

  • Craig Kollman

    (Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida)

  • Martin Maiers

    (National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota)

  • Brent Logan

    (Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)

  • Loren Gragert

    (National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota)

  • Michelle Setterholm

    (National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota)

  • Mary M. Horowitz

    (International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry, Health Policy Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)

Abstract

Background. Transplantation with stem cells from stored umbilical cord blood units is an alternative to living unrelated bone marrow transplantation. The larger the inventory of stored cord units, the greater the likelihood that transplant candidates will match to a unit, but storing units is costly. The authors present the results of a study, commissioned by the Institute of Medicine, as part of a report on the establishment of a national cord blood bank, examining the optimal inventory level. They emphasize the unique challenges of undertaking cost-effectiveness analysis in this field and the contribution of the analysis to policy. Methods. The authors estimate the likelihood that transplant candidates will match to a living unrelated marrow donor or a cord blood unit as a function of cord blood inventory and then calculate the life-years gained for each transplant type by match level using historical data. They develop a model of the cord blood inventory level to estimate total costs as a function of the number of stored units. Results. The cost per life-year gained associated with increasing inventory from 50,000 to 100,000 units is $44,000 to $86,000 and from 100,000 to 150,000 units is $64,000 to $153,000, depending on the assumption about the degree to which survival rates for cord transplants vary by match quality. Conclusion. Expanding the cord blood inventory above current levels is cost-effective by conventional standards. The analysis helped shape the Institute of Medicine's report, but it is difficult to determine the extent to which the analysis influenced subsequent congressional legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • David H. Howard & David Meltzer & Craig Kollman & Martin Maiers & Brent Logan & Loren Gragert & Michelle Setterholm & Mary M. Horowitz, 2008. "Use of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Determine Inventory Size for a National Cord Blood Bank," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(2), pages 243-253, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:2:p:243-253
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07308750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X07308750
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X07308750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damien Sheehan-Connor & Theodore Bergstrom & Rodney Garratt, 2015. "Saving lives with stem cell transplants," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 23-51, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:28:y:2008:i:2:p:243-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.