IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v27y2007i4p414-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abnormal Outcomes Following Cervical Cancer Screening: Event Duration and Health Utility Loss

Author

Listed:
  • Ralph P. Insinga

    (Department of Health Economic Statistics, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, Pennsylvania, Ralph_insinga@merck.com)

  • Andrew G. Glass

    (Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon)

  • Evan R. Myers

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina)

  • Brenda B. Rush

    (Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon)

Abstract

Background. For decision analytic models, little empirical data are available from which to model the amount of time women spend with various cervical cytologic and histologic diagnoses following an abnormal Pap smear or the associated loss in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Methods. The authors retrospectively examined administrative and cytopathology data for women with abnormal routine cervical smears within the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (Portland, OR) health plan during 1998. Data were examined through the conclusion of follow-up, with final outcomes categorized as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 1 to 3 ( n = 201) or a false-positive result ( n = 722) if no CIN or cancer was detected on fol low-up. CIN outcomes were assigned according to the initial grade of dysplasia observed during the care episode in the primary analysis. The number of months spent with various cytologic and histologic diagnoses during the course of follow-up was tabulated, and utility weights were assigned using data from a prior study reporting time tradeoff scores for cervical health states. Results. The average total duration of follow-up was between 18 and 22 months for women with CIN, compared with 10 months for a false-positive Pap smear. The number of months spent with either an abnormal cytologic or histologic diagnosis was greater ( P = 0.01) for women with CIN 1 (12.6 months) than CIN 3 (9.2 months), although this relationship was reversed for time spent receiving negative follow-up Pap smears and biopsies to rule out the presence of CIN and cancer. Total QALY losses per episode of care were estimated to be 0.11 for all 3 grades of CIN and 0.04 for a false-positive Pap smear. Conclusions. The health and psychosocial burdens asso ciated with follow-up for abnormal Pap smears translate into tangible QALY losses in a decision analytic context, with women receiving many months of follow-up and a variety of cytologic and histologic diagnoses over the course of a care episode.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralph P. Insinga & Andrew G. Glass & Evan R. Myers & Brenda B. Rush, 2007. "Abnormal Outcomes Following Cervical Cancer Screening: Event Duration and Health Utility Loss," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(4), pages 414-422, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:4:p:414-422
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07302128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X07302128
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X07302128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oren Shavit & Raanan Raz & Michal Stein & Gabriel Chodick & Eduardo Schejter & Yehuda Ben-David & Raanan Cohen & Daphna Arbel & Varda Shalev, 2012. "Evaluating the epidemiology and morbidity burden associated with human papillomavirus in Israel," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 87-97, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:4:p:414-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.