Author
Listed:
- Sharon A. Cook
(St. Helens and Knowsley Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Merseyside, United Kingdom, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom)
- Robert Rosser
(St. Helens and Knowsley Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Merseyside, United Kingdom, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom)
- M. Ian James
(St. Helens and Knowsley Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Merseyside, United Kingdom)
- Sue Kaney
(St. Helens and Knowsley Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Whiston Hospital, Prescot, Merseyside, United Kingdom, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom)
- Peter Salmon
(Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Background. Current guidelines for surgeons' decisions about whether to offer cosmetic surgery are ineffective. Therefore, surgeons have to make difficult decisions on a case-by-case basis. The authors sought to identify the patient variables that influence surgeons' decisions in practice. Design. A qualitative study first delineated, from observation of consultations and interviews with surgeons and other staff, variables that might influence their decisions. Then, in a cross-sectional survey of patients seeking cosmetic surgery, the authors measured these variables and tested whether they predicted the surgeons' decisions to offer surgery. Participants. Participants were 6 consultant plastic surgeons who assess cosmetic surgery referrals and 276 new patients aged 16 years or older referred to these surgeons. Results. The qualitative study suggested that, as well as clinical factors (the probability of a satisfactory surgical outcome and the risks v. benefits of surgery), surgery was more likely to be offered where it was of low cost (i.e., minor skin surgery), physical symptoms or dysfunction were present, and abnormality of appearance was extreme. The role of patients' quality of life was unclear. The quantitative study confirmed that the probability of surgery was increased where requests were for minor skin procedures and by abnormality of patients' appearance. In patients seeking major body procedures, surgery was less likely when patients reported poor quality of life. Conclusion. Surgeons' decisions about whether to offer elective cosmetic surgery follow systematic rules. By incorporating the factors that surgeons use in their decision making, more effective guidelines about elective cosmetic surgery provision than are presently available could be developed.
Suggested Citation
Sharon A. Cook & Robert Rosser & M. Ian James & Sue Kaney & Peter Salmon, 2007.
"Factors Influencing Surgeons' Decisions in Elective Cosmetic Surgery Consultations,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(3), pages 311-320, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:3:p:311-320
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07300607
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:27:y:2007:i:3:p:311-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.