IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v26y2006i3p226-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Cancer Staging Uncertainties in Radiation Therapy Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Robert C. Lee

    (University of Calgary, Alberta Cancer Board, rclee@ucalgary.ca)

  • Edidiong Ekaette

    (University of Calgary, Alberta Cancer Board)

  • Karie-Lynn Kelly

    (University of Calgary, Alberta Cancer Board)

  • Peter Craighead

    (University of Calgary, Alberta Cancer Board)

  • Chris Newcomb

    (University of Calgary, Alberta Cancer Board)

  • Peter Dunscombe

    (University of Calgary, Alberta Cancer Board)

Abstract

Introduction . Radiation therapy (RT) for cancer is a critical medical procedure that occurs in a complex environment involving numerous health professionals, hardware, software, and equipment. Uncertainties and potential incidents can lead to inappropriate administration of radiation to patients, with sometimes catastrophic consequences such as premature death or appreciably impaired quality of life. The authors evaluate the impact of incorrectly staging (i.e., estimation of extent of cancer) breast cancer patients and resulting inappropriate treatment decisions. Methods . The authors employ analytic and simulation methods in an influence-diagram framework to estimate the probability of incorrect staging and treatment decisions. As inputs, they use a combination of literature information on the accuracy and precision of pathology and tests as well as expert judgment. Sensitivity and value-of-information analyses are conducted to identify important uncertainties. Results and conclusions . The authors find a small but nontrivial probability that breast cancer patients will be incorrectly staged and thus may be subjected to inappropriate treatment. Results are sensitive to a number of variables, and some routinely used tests for metastasis have very limited information value. This work has implications for the methods used in cancer staging, and the methods are generalizable for quantitative risk assessment of treatment errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert C. Lee & Edidiong Ekaette & Karie-Lynn Kelly & Peter Craighead & Chris Newcomb & Peter Dunscombe, 2006. "Implications of Cancer Staging Uncertainties in Radiation Therapy Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(3), pages 226-238, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:3:p:226-238
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06288684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X06288684
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X06288684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edidiong Ekaette & Robert C. Lee & David L. Cooke & Sandra Iftody & Peter Craighead, 2007. "Probabilistic Fault Tree Analysis of a Radiation Treatment System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 1395-1410, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:3:p:226-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.