IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v25y2005i3p283-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mammographers’ Perception of Women’s Breast Cancer Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph R. Egger

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA)

  • Gary R. Cutter

    (Center for Research Design and Statistical Methods, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV)

  • Patricia A. Carney

    (Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH)

  • Stephen H. Taplin

    (National Cancer Institute, Applied Research Program, Bethesda, MD)

  • William E. Barlow

    (Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA)

  • R. Edward Hendrick

    (The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL)

  • Carl J. D’Orsi

    (Breast Imaging Center, Emory Health Care Services, Atlanta, GA)

  • Jessica S. Fosse

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA)

  • Linn Abraham

    (Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA)

  • Joann G. Elmore

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, jelmore@u.washington.edu)

Abstract

Objective . To understand mammographers’ perception of individual women’s breast cancer risk. Materials and Methods . Radiologists interpreting screening mammography examinations completed a mailed survey consisting of questions pertaining to demographic and clinical practice characteristics, as well as 2 vignettes describing different risk profiles of women. Respondents were asked to estimate the probability of a breast cancer diagnosis in the next 5 years for each vignette. Vignette responses were plotted against mean recall rates in actual clinical practice. Results . The survey was returned by 77% of eligible radiologists. Ninety-three percent of radiologists overestimated risk in the vignette involving a 70-year-old woman; 96% overestimated risk in the vignette involving a 41-year-old woman. Radiologists who more accurately estimated breast cancer risk were younger, worked full-time, were affiliated with an academic medical center, had fellowship training, had fewer than 10 years experience interpreting mammograms, and worked more than 40% of the time in breast imaging. However, only age was statistically significant. No association was found between radiologists’ risk estimate and their recall rate. Conclusion . U.S. radiologists have a heightened perception of breast cancer risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph R. Egger & Gary R. Cutter & Patricia A. Carney & Stephen H. Taplin & William E. Barlow & R. Edward Hendrick & Carl J. D’Orsi & Jessica S. Fosse & Linn Abraham & Joann G. Elmore, 2005. "Mammographers’ Perception of Women’s Breast Cancer Risk," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(3), pages 283-289, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:25:y:2005:i:3:p:283-289
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05276857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X05276857
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X05276857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:25:y:2005:i:3:p:283-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.