Author
Listed:
- Alvin I. Mushlin
(Departments of Public Health and Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, aim2001@med.cornell.edu)
- Lisa M. Kern
(Departments of Public Health and Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY)
- Mary Paris
(Departments of Community and Preventive Medicine and Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY)
- David R. Lambert
(Departments of Community and Preventive Medicine and Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY)
- Geoffrey Williams
(Departments of Community and Preventive Medicine and Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY)
Abstract
Background . The results of diagnostic tests often have a profound impact on the way patients view their health. Decision analyses and clinical guidelines do not routinely consider this, in part because methods are not well developed for measuring the value of testing to patients. Objectives . To measure the value of stress testing to patients with chest pain suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) and to improve methods for measuring the value of diagnostic information. Methods . The authors conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with chest pain who were referred from 44 primary care practices for treadmill testing (N = 320). Current health status, perceived life expectancy, anxiety, uncertainty, and preferences for current health states were measured before and 1 week after testing and receipt of the results. Patients also reported the diagnosis given by their physicians after testing. The authors used paired t tests to assess changes before and after testing. Results . Perceived life expectancy lengthened, anxiety decreased, and uncertainty decreased 1 week after exercise testing, compared to before (P
Suggested Citation
Alvin I. Mushlin & Lisa M. Kern & Mary Paris & David R. Lambert & Geoffrey Williams, 2005.
"The Value of Diagnostic Information to Patients with Chest Pain Suggestive of Coronary Artery Disease,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(2), pages 149-157, March.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:25:y:2005:i:2:p:149-157
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05275157
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:25:y:2005:i:2:p:149-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.