Author
Listed:
- Robert F. Wagner
(Office of Science and Technology, Center for Devices & Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland)
- Craig A. Beam
(Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa)
- Sergey V. Beiden
(Office of Science and Technology, Center for Devices & Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland)
Abstract
The multiple-reader, multiple-case (MRMC) approach to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is becoming the dominant assessment paradigm in medical imaging. Its most common version involves having many readers read every patient case in the study, a critical feature since differences among competing imaging modalities are often dominated by differences in reader performance. The present authors have carried out MRMC ROC analysis on a uniquely large data set for mammography. The analysis quantifies the great range of observed reader skill in that data set. It also demonstrates that the sample sizes are sufficiently large that the conclusions generalize to the populations sampled here with little uncertainty from the finite sample size. A schematic approach to bracketing the utility matrix is then used to study trends in the resulting expected utility functions that correspond to the range of observed ROC curves. This is done for both the screening and the diagnostic context. The results raise 2 hypotheses for further investigation. First, it is possible that the present ambiguity surrounding the effectiveness of mammography is due in part to the observed range of reader skills and corresponding expected utility functions. Second, it is possible that computer-assisted modalities for mammography may lead to improvements in the expected utility function not only for screening but also in the diagnostic context, especially for the lower performing readers.
Suggested Citation
Robert F. Wagner & Craig A. Beam & Sergey V. Beiden, 2004.
"Reader Variability in Mammography and Its Implications for Expected Utility over the Population of Readers and Cases,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(6), pages 561-572, November.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:561-572
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04271043
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:561-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.