IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v23y2003i4p323-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Directly Elicited Preferences to Preferences Derived from the SF-36 in Adults with Asthma

Author

Listed:
  • Todd A. Lee
  • William Hollingworth
  • Sean D. Sullivan

Abstract

Introduction. Algorithms have been developed that estimate preferences from the Short Form 36 (SF-36). The objective of this study was to compare SF-36-derived preferences to directly elicited preferences. Methods. The authors used data from a clinical trial of adult asthmatics to derive preferences from the SF-36 and compare those to visual analog scale (VAS) values and the Asthma Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Results. The differences between VAS and derived preferences ranged from -0.066 to 0.024 at baseline and 0.006 to 0.107 at the end of follow-up. All measures improved from baseline (P

Suggested Citation

  • Todd A. Lee & William Hollingworth & Sean D. Sullivan, 2003. "Comparison of Directly Elicited Preferences to Preferences Derived from the SF-36 in Adults with Asthma," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(4), pages 323-334, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:323-334
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03256009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X03256009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X03256009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christine McDonough & Anna Tosteson, 2007. "Measuring Preferences for Cost-Utility Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 93-106, February.
    2. D. Stratmann‐Schoene & T. Kuehn & R. Kreienberg & R. Leidl, 2006. "A preference‐based index for the SF‐12," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 553-564, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:323-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.