IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v22y2002i3p238-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visual Illusions Created by Survival Curves and the Need to Avoid Potential Misinterpretation

Author

Listed:
  • Ernest W. Lau

    (Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom)

  • G. A. Ng

    (Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials play an increasingly important role in guiding management decisions, and survival curves are the most popular means for summarizing and depicting the results of a clinical trial. However, survival curves may create certain “visual illusions†that can be misinterpreted by the unwary, with potentially adverse effects on patient care. The authors provide a brief outline of the theoretical background of survival curves and explain the origin of the most common visual illusions. Statisticians need to be aware of such potential for misinterpretation of clinical trial data in order to safeguard clinicians against drawing undue inferences and applying them to actual practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernest W. Lau & G. A. Ng, 2002. "Visual Illusions Created by Survival Curves and the Need to Avoid Potential Misinterpretation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(3), pages 238-244, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:238-244
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0202200312
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X0202200312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian J. Zikmund‐Fisher & Angela Fagerlin & Peter A. Ubel, 2005. "What's Time Got to Do with It? Inattention to Duration in Interpretation of Survival Graphs," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 589-595, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:238-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.