IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v22y2002i1p6-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simulation Model of Policies Directed at Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence

Author

Listed:
  • David T. Levy

    (University of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland)

  • Karen Friend

    (Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island)

Abstract

Objectives . The authors develop a simulation model to predict the effects on quit rates and cost-effectiveness of different smoking treatment policies. Methods . A decision theoretic model of quit behavior is first developed that incorporates the decision to quit and the choice of treatment. A policy model then examines the effect on quit attempts and quit rates of policies to cover the costs of different combinations of treatments and to require health care providers to conduct brief interventions. The model incorporates substitution between treatments and effects of policies on treatment effectiveness. The cost per quit is also calculated for each policy. Results . The model of quit behavior predicts a 1-year quit rate of 4.5% for the population of smokers. The policy model predicts a 37% increase in quit rates from a policy that combines mandated brief interventions with coverage of all proven tobacco treatments. Smaller effects are predicted from policies that provide more restricted coverage of treatments, especially those limited to behavioral treatment. Payments for brief interventions alone increase quit rates by about 7%. Brief intervention and behavioral therapy policies had lower costs per quit but yield substantially fewer additional quits than policies that cover pharmacotherapy. There is, however, considerable variation around these estimates depending on assumptions about the effects of policy on treatment use, substitution between treatments, and treatment effectiveness. Conclusion . Tobacco treatment policies, especially those with broad and flexible coverage, have the potential to substantially increase smoking quit rates. However, further research is needed on the effect of payment policies on the use and effectiveness of tobacco treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • David T. Levy & Karen Friend, 2002. "A Simulation Model of Policies Directed at Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(1), pages 6-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:1:p:6-17
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0202200101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X0202200101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sean A. Simpson & James M. Nonnemaker, 2013. "New York Tobacco Control Program Cessation Assistance: Costs, Benefits, and Effectiveness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Levy, David T. & Hyland, Andrew & Higbee, Cheryl & Remer, Lillian & Compton, Christine, 2007. "The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California: Results from the California Tobacco Policy Simulation Model," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 167-185, July.
    3. Stavroula A Chrysanthopoulou, 2017. "MILC: A Microsimulation Model of the Natural History of Lung Cancer," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 10(3), pages 5-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:1:p:6-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.