IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v21y2001i3p170-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-Case Mix Model for Analyzing Variation in Cesarean Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Leslie Eldenburg

    (University of Arizona)

  • William S. Waller

    (University of Arizona, Hong Kong University of Science &! Technology)

Abstract

This article contributes a decision-case mix model for analyzing variation in c-section rates. Like recent contributions to the literature, the model systematically takes into account the effect of case mix. Going beyond past research, the model highlights differences in physician decision making in response to obstetric factors. Distinguishing the effects of physician decision making and case mix is important in understanding why c-section rates vary and in developing programs to effect change in physician behavior. The model was applied to a sample of deliveries at a hospital where physicians exhibited considerable variation in their c-section rates. Comparing groups with a low versus high rate, the authors’ general conclusion is that the difference in physician decision tendencies (to perform a c-section), in response to specific obstetric factors, is at least as important as case mix in explaining variation in c-section rates. The exact effects of decision making versus case mix depend on how the model application defines the obstetric condition of interest and on the weighting of deliveries by their estimated “risk of Cesarean.†The general conclusion is supported by an additional analysis that uses the model’s elements to predict individual physicians’ annual c-section rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Leslie Eldenburg & William S. Waller, 2001. "Decision-Case Mix Model for Analyzing Variation in Cesarean Rates," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(3), pages 170-179, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:3:p:170-179
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0102100302
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X0102100302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:3:p:170-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.