IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v21y2001i2p87-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reanalysis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Management

Author

Listed:
  • Noriaki Aoki

    (Information Research and Planning, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, Department of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan)

  • J. Robert Beck

    (Information Research and Planning, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas)

  • Takao Kitahara

    (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Sadayoshi Ohbu

    (Department of Neurology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen’s Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Kazui Soma

    (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Takashi Ohwada

    (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Richard W. Cone

    (Information Research and Planning, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas)

  • Tsuguya Fukui

    (Department of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan)

Abstract

Objective. This report updates previous clinical decision analysis for patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UN-AN) based on newly published data and discusses the role of reanalysis in individual decision making. Methods. The authors employed probabilities for the natural history of UN-AN and results of preventive surgery based on the report by the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo simulation and traditional n-way sensitivity analyses were used to assess the uncertainty of clinical decisions. Results. The baseline decision in favor of preventive surgery is reversed by new data from the international study. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed several populations showing heterogeneity in terms of strategy selection. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses detected two important factors for decision making: annual rupture rate and utility for knowingly living with UN-AN. Conclusions. Annual UN-AN rupture rate and the utility for knowingly living with UN-AN are key factors when deciding on a therapeutic strategy. Also, updating published decision analyses can improve clinical decision making by integrating clinical judgment and newly available clinical data.

Suggested Citation

  • Noriaki Aoki & J. Robert Beck & Takao Kitahara & Sadayoshi Ohbu & Kazui Soma & Takashi Ohwada & Richard W. Cone & Tsuguya Fukui, 2001. "Reanalysis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Management," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(2), pages 87-96, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:2:p:87-96
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0102100201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X0102100201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:21:y:2001:i:2:p:87-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.