IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v20y2000i4p440-450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic Trial Banks: A Complementary Method for Reporting Randomized Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Ida Sim

    (Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Sim: Department of Medicine, and Medical Information Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, Room A-405, San Francisco, CA 94143-0320; telephone: (415) 502-1954; fax: (415) 476-7964; e-mail:)

  • Douglas K. Owens

    (Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Sim: Department of Medicine, and Medical Information Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, Room A-405, San Francisco, CA 94143-0320; telephone: (415) 502-1954; fax: (415) 476-7964; e-mail:)

  • Philip W. Lavori

    (Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Sim: Department of Medicine, and Medical Information Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, Room A-405, San Francisco, CA 94143-0320; telephone: (415) 502-1954; fax: (415) 476-7964; e-mail:)

  • Glenn D. Rennels

    (Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Sim: Department of Medicine, and Medical Information Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, Room A-405, San Francisco, CA 94143-0320; telephone: (415) 502-1954; fax: (415) 476-7964; e-mail:)

Abstract

Background. Randomized clinical trial (RCT) results are often difficult to find, interpret, or apply to clinical care. The authors propose that RCTs be reported into electronic knowledge bases—trial banks—in addition to being reported in text. What information should these trial-bank reports contain? Methods. Using the competency decomposition method, the authors specified the ideal trial-bank contents as the information necessary and sufficient for completing the task of systematic reviewing. Results. They decomposed the systematic reviewing task into four top-level tasks and 62 subtasks. 162 types of trial information were necessary and sufficient for completing these subtasks. These items relate to a trial's design, execution, administration, and results. Conclusion. Trial-bank publishing of these 162 items would capture into computer-understandable form all the trial information needed for critically appraising and synthesizing trial results. Decision-support systems that access shared, up-to-date trial banks could help clinicians manage, synthesize, and apply RCT evidence more effectively. Key words: electronic publishing; knowledge bases; clinical trials; meta-analysis. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:440-450)

Suggested Citation

  • Ida Sim & Douglas K. Owens & Philip W. Lavori & Glenn D. Rennels, 2000. "Electronic Trial Banks: A Complementary Method for Reporting Randomized Trials," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 20(4), pages 440-450, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:20:y:2000:i:4:p:440-450
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0002000408
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X0002000408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:20:y:2000:i:4:p:440-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.