Author
Listed:
- Ivana Unic
- Lia C.G. Verhoef
- Peep F.M. Stalmeier
- Willem A.J. Van Daal
Abstract
Background. Women suspected to have the BRCA1/2 mutation may choose between two management options: breast cancer screening and prophylactic mastectomy (PM). Objectives . To compare women's treatment choices with medical and decision-analytic recommendations and to explore variables related to the women's choices. Methods. After provision of information, individual time-tradeoff values for the health outcome "living after PM" were assessed and incorporated into a decision-analytic model, which compared the management options PM and screening with respect to their effects on quality-adjusted life expectancy. Results. Of the 54 women suspected to have the mutation, 51 completed the shared-decision-making procedure. Quality-adjusted life expectancy after PM management was longer for 67% of proven carriers and for 58% of women awaiting the DNA-test result. Twelve proven carriers made definitive treatment choices: eight (67%) chose PM and four (33%) chose screening. All carriers' treatment choices agreed with the normative decision-analytic recommendations. Four (33%) disagreed with the medical recommendations. Of the 36 women awaiting DNA-test results, 32 made hypothetical treatment choices. The agreement between these hypothetical treatment choices and the decision-analytic recommendations was good (78%). Combining data from all 48 women, being married (OR = 14.00, p = 0.006), having children (OR = 4.71, p = 0.02), low desire to participate (OR = 0.14, p = 0.004), high decisional stress (OR = 5.22, p = 0.01), a lower estimate of the "probability of cure for screen-detected breast cancer" (OR = 0.13, p = 0.004), and higher time-tradeoff values for PM (OR = 182, p
Suggested Citation
Ivana Unic & Lia C.G. Verhoef & Peep F.M. Stalmeier & Willem A.J. Van Daal, 2000.
"Prophylactic Mastectomy or Screening in Women Suspected to Have the BRCA1/2 Mutation,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 20(3), pages 251-262, July.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:20:y:2000:i:3:p:251-262
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000301
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:20:y:2000:i:3:p:251-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.