IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v19y1999i1p42-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Practice Pathway for the Initial Diagnostic Evaluation of Isolated Sixth Cranial Nerve Palsies

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth W. Miller
  • Andrew G. Lee
  • Jade S. Schiffman
  • Thomas C. Prager
  • Raymund Garza
  • Patricia F. Jenkins
  • Paul Sforza
  • Alan Verm
  • David Kaufman
  • Wendy Robinson
  • Eric Eggenberger
  • Rosa A. Tang

Abstract

Purpose: To define a practice pathway for the evaluation of sixth-nerve palsies (SNPs) and to determine its cost—effectiveness and validity in a retrospective chart review. Methods: A Medline search of the English-language literature from 1966 to 1995 was performed to define the available clinical evidence and develop the practice pathway. The authors retrospectively reviewed 407 charts with the diagnosis of SNP seen at three centers. Information obtained included: etiologic diagnosis if known; development of new neurologic or ophthalmologic findings; and results and costs of neuroimaging studies, if performed. Results: Of the 407 patients, 98 underwent computed tomogra phy scans and 212 underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the head. Eighty cases were non-isolated, 317 were isolated SNP, and ten could not be classified from chart information. Of the 317 cases of isolated SNP, 49 were classified as traumatic; 5, congenital; 158, vasculopathic; 63, nonvasculopathic; and 42, progressive or unre solved. Following the recommendations of the practice pathway, the 158 patients clas sified as having vasculopathic SNP would not have undergone neuroimaging studies, realizing a savings of $100,000 in this study population of 407 patients. Conclusion: The recommendations of the practice pathway are supported by review of the literature and the retrospective review of these cases. However, a prospective study with a matched control group is needed to demonstrate regional and specialty-specific van ations in care and to strengthen the clinical certainty of the pathway recommendations. Key words: practice pathway; diagnostic evaluation; sixth cranial nerve palsies; oph thalmology. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:42-48)

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth W. Miller & Andrew G. Lee & Jade S. Schiffman & Thomas C. Prager & Raymund Garza & Patricia F. Jenkins & Paul Sforza & Alan Verm & David Kaufman & Wendy Robinson & Eric Eggenberger & Rosa A. Tang, 1999. "A Practice Pathway for the Initial Diagnostic Evaluation of Isolated Sixth Cranial Nerve Palsies," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(1), pages 42-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:1:p:42-48
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9901900106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9901900106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:1:p:42-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.