IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v17y1997i4p447-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Treatment Thresholds to Diagnostic-test Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Karel G.M. Moons
  • Theo Stijnen
  • Bowine C. Michel
  • Harry R. Büller
  • Gerrit-Anne Van Es
  • Diederick E. Grobbee
  • J. Dik F. Habbema

Abstract

Diagnostic tests are often evaluated by comparison of the areas under receiver op erating charactenstic (ROC) curves. In this study the authors compared this approach with a more direct method that takes into account consequences of a diagnosis. Data from a prospective study of diagnosis of pulmonary embolism were used for a moti vating example. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, three diagnostic mod els were built and compared based on their ROC curves. Although model 1 (0.706) and model 2 (0.702) had the same ROC-curve area, they performed differently when risks and benefits of subsequent decisions were considered by applying the treatment probability threshold. Models 1 and 3 (0.611) had substantially different ROC-curve areas but performed similarly taking into account the therapeutic consequences. This demonstrates that comparison of diagnostic tests using the areas under the ROC curves may lead to erroneous conclusions about therapeutic usefulness. To corre spond to daily practice, it would be more appropriate to also consider the clinical im plications in evaluating diagnostic tests. This is made feasible by explicit definition and application of a treatment threshold. Key words: benefits and risks; clinical relevance; diagnosis; diagnostic test evaluation; ROC curve; treatment threshold. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:447-454)

Suggested Citation

  • Karel G.M. Moons & Theo Stijnen & Bowine C. Michel & Harry R. Büller & Gerrit-Anne Van Es & Diederick E. Grobbee & J. Dik F. Habbema, 1997. "Application of Treatment Thresholds to Diagnostic-test Evaluation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(4), pages 447-454, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:17:y:1997:i:4:p:447-454
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9701700410
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9701700410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A. Greenes & Kevin C. Cain & Colin B. Begg, 1984. "Patient-Oriented Performance Measures of Diagnostic Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 4(1), pages 7-15, February.
    2. Robert A. Greenes & Colin B. Begg & Kevin C. Cain & John A. Swets & Carl E. Feehrer & Barbara J. McNeil, 1984. "Patient-Oriented Performance Measures of Diagnostic Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 4(1), pages 17-31, February.
    3. Kevin C. Cain & Robert A. Greenes & Colin B. Begg, 1984. "Patient-Oriented Performance Measures," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 4(1), pages 33-46, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan Mallett & Steve Halligan & Gary S Collins & Doug G Altman, 2014. "Exploration of Analysis Methods for Diagnostic Imaging Tests: Problems with ROC AUC and Confidence Scores in CT Colonography," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom J. Wachtel & David B. Reuben & John P. Fulton & Steven A. Wartman, 1985. "The Use of the "Range of Uncertainty"," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 5(3), pages 325-334, August.
    2. David L. Simel & John R. Feussner & Elizabeth R. Delong & David B. Matchar, 1987. "Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 7(2), pages 107-114, June.
    3. Arthur Hartz & Robert Centor, 1986. "Measures of the Value of a Diagnostic Test Derived from Stochastic Thresholds," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 6(3), pages 149-153, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:17:y:1997:i:4:p:447-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.