IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v16y1996i4p412-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferences for Likelihood Ratios in the Absence of a "Gold Standard"

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence Joseph
  • Theresa W. Gyorkos

Abstract

Likelihood ratios are extensively used to evaluate the performances of diagnostic tests and to update prior odds of disease to posttest odds. Since few tests are truly 100% accurate, including many used as "gold standards," it is important to be able to esti mate likelihood ratios in cases where no such standard is available. In this paper, methods to calculate point and interval estimates for likelihood ratios are described. The results numerically coincide with those reviewed by Centor when a "gold standard" is assumed available, but typically provide wider interval estimates when such a stan dard is not available, reflecting the increased uncertainty inherent in such situations. Unlike previous techniques, the methods do not require normal approximations or log arithmic transformations, and hence provide accurate estimates even when parameter distributions are highly skewed. The methods are illustrated using the results of two different diagnostic tests for the presence of an intestinal parasitic infection. Key words: Bayesian analysis ; diagnostic tests; epidemiologic methods; likelihood ratios; Monte Carlo methods; statistical models. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:412-417)

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence Joseph & Theresa W. Gyorkos, 1996. "Inferences for Likelihood Ratios in the Absence of a "Gold Standard"," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 16(4), pages 412-417, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:16:y:1996:i:4:p:412-417
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9601600412
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9601600412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:16:y:1996:i:4:p:412-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.