IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v16y1996i3p254-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term Care Residents' Preferences for Health States on the Quality of Well-Being Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Ron D. Hays
  • Albert L. Siu
  • Emmett Keeler
  • Grant N. Marshall
  • Robert M. Kaplan
  • Sandra Simmons
  • Daryl El Mouchi
  • John F. Schnelle

Abstract

The Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB) quantifies health-related quality of life with a single number that represents community-based preferences for combinations of symptom/problem complexes, mobility, physical activity, and social activity. The aim of this study was to compare preferences of a long-term care population with those of the general population, determine whether preferences vary by the age of the hypo thetical (target) person depicted in the health-state case description, and derive weights for new symptom/problem complexes of particular relevance to frail, older individuals. A sample of 38 female and 12 male long-term care residents with an average age of 86 years was asked to rate health-state scenarios that combined the four health domains of the QWB. This sample rated quality of life 0.10 units lower on average (on a 0-1 scale) than did the general population sample from which the QWB preferences were originally developed. Ratings of the same health state for younger versus older target persons did not differ significantly (all p values > 0.05 for t statistics). Weights derived for 11 new symptom/problem complexes were: disturbed sleep (-0.252), sit-to-stand requires maximal effort (-0.259), lonely (-0.265), walking a short distance causes extreme fatigue (-0.273), agitated (-0.284), hallucinating (-0.355), incontinent (-0.359), unable to control one's behavior (-0.360), urinary catheter (-0.374), restrained in bed or chair (-0.374), and feeding tube through the nose or stomach (-0.402). These new weights increase the relevance of the QWB for cost-utility evaluations of health interventions for long-term care residents. Key words: health state preferences; long-term care; patient preferences; Quality of Well-Being Scale; quality of life; age factors. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:254-261)

Suggested Citation

  • Ron D. Hays & Albert L. Siu & Emmett Keeler & Grant N. Marshall & Robert M. Kaplan & Sandra Simmons & Daryl El Mouchi & John F. Schnelle, 1996. "Long-term Care Residents' Preferences for Health States on the Quality of Well-Being Scale," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 16(3), pages 254-261, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:16:y:1996:i:3:p:254-261
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9601600310
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9601600310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gretchen B. Chapman & Arthur S. Elstein & Timothy M. Kuzel & Roohollah Sharifi & Robert B. Nadler & Anita Andrews & Charles L. Bennett, 1998. "Prostate Cancer Patients' Utilities for Health States," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(3), pages 278-286, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:16:y:1996:i:3:p:254-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.