IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v16y1996i1p51-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Boolean Decision Rules Applied to Multiple-observer Decision Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • William Maguire

Abstract

A model that derives multiple-observer decision strategy ROC curves for boolean decision rules applied to binary decisions of two or three observers is presented. It is assumed that covert decision variables consistent with ROC models of observer performance underlie decisions and that readers' decision criteria are in a fixed relationship. The specific param eters of individual ROC curves and the correlational structure that describes interobserver agreement have dramatic effects upon the relative benefits to be derived from different boolean strategies A common strategy employed in clinical practice, in which the overall decision is positive if any observer makes a positive decision, is most effective when the readers are of similar ability, when they adopt similar decision criteria, when interreader agreement is greater for negative than for positive cases, and when the individual ROC slope is «1.0 Different multiple-observer decision strategies can be evaluated using the model equations A bootstrap method for testing model-associated hypotheses is described. Key words: ROC analysis; diagnostic accuracy; image interpretation. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:51-57)

Suggested Citation

  • William Maguire, 1996. "Modeling Boolean Decision Rules Applied to Multiple-observer Decision Strategies," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 16(1), pages 51-57, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:16:y:1996:i:1:p:51-57
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9601600113
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9601600113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:16:y:1996:i:1:p:51-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.