IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v15y1995i4p387-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical and Scientific Features of Cutoff-based Designs of Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph C. Cappelleri
  • William M.K. Trochim

Abstract

Cutoff-based clinical trial designs are geared towards balancing ethical and scientific con cerns when it is deemed unethical or infeasible to randomize all patients to study treatments. In a cutoff-based design with randomization, patients who are the least sick based on a quantitative baseline indicator are assigned the control treatment, patients who are the most sick based on the same indicator are assigned to test treatment, and patients who are moderately sick based on the indicator are randomly assigned. Simulations were conducted to examine statistical efficiency and potential bias for designs with varying amounts of cutoff- based assignment and randomization. All design variations yielded unbiased estimates of a main treatment effect and a linear interaction effect. While randomization tends to lead to greater efficiency (or lower standard errors of treatment effect), the correlation between the binary treatment variable and baseline assignment variable completely determines the ef ficiency of a design. Key words: clinical trials; randomized control trials; randomization; cutoff- based designs; experimental designs; quasi-experimental designs; methodology; statistical efficiency; bias. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:387-394)

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph C. Cappelleri & William M.K. Trochim, 1995. "Ethical and Scientific Features of Cutoff-based Designs of Clinical Trials," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(4), pages 387-394, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:4:p:387-394
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9501500409
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9501500409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marvin B. Mandell, 2008. "Having One's Cake and Eating It, Too," Evaluation Review, , vol. 32(5), pages 415-434, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:4:p:387-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.