IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v15y1995i4p367-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rank-order Stability Analysis (ROSA)

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas R. Einarson
  • Steven R. Arikian
  • John J. Doyle

Abstract

In a pharmacoeconomic analysis, the validity of findings is critical because product ranking may influence formulary decision making. The authors present an approach for examining uncertainty in a pharmacoeconomic analysis that parallels the confidence-interval approach to statistical analysis. This method, rank-order stability analysis (ROSA), is a clear and comprehensive method for validating results of a pharmacoeconomic analysis, as it identifies and evaluates all inputs and values. It is a break-even analysis that identifies the specific point of insensitivity for all parameters analyzed in the pharmacoeconomic model. ROSA is proposed as the preferred method for judging the validity of results derived from estimated parameters in pharmacoeconomic analyses. Key words: pharmacoeconomic analysis; sen sitivity analysis; robustness; cost-effectiveness analysis; rank-order stability analysis. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:367-372)

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas R. Einarson & Steven R. Arikian & John J. Doyle, 1995. "Rank-order Stability Analysis (ROSA)," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(4), pages 367-372, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:4:p:367-372
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9501500407
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9501500407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guyatt, Gordon & Drummond, Michael & Feeny, David & Tugwell, Peter & Stoddart, Greg & Haynes, R. Brian & Bennett, Kathryn & Labelle, Roberta, 1986. "Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 393-408, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morik, Katharina & Imhoff, Michael & Brockhausen, Peter & Joachims, Thorsten & Gather, Ursula, 2000. "Knowledge discovery and knowledge validation in intensive care," Technical Reports 2000,14, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    2. Fried, Roland & Gather, Ursula & Imhoff, Michael, 2001. "Pattern recognition in intensive care online monitoring," Technical Reports 2001,15, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    3. Elahe Khorasani & Majid Davari & Abbas Kebriaeezadeh & Farshad Fatemi & Ali Akbari Sari & Vida Varahrami, 2022. "A comprehensive review of official discount rates in guidelines of health economic evaluations over time: the trends and roots," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(9), pages 1577-1590, December.
    4. Brooke S. Harrow & Thomas M. Lasater & Kim M. Gans, 1996. "A Strategy for Accurate Collection of Incremental Cost Data for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Field Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(3), pages 275-290, June.
    5. Imhoff, Michael & Bauer, Marcus & Gather, Ursula & Löhlein, Dietrich, 1998. "Time series analysis in intensive care medicine," Technical Reports 1998,01, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    6. Maureen P. M. H. Rutten‐van Mölken & Eddy K. A. Van & René C. J. A. van Vliet, 1994. "Statistical analysis of cost outcomes in a randomized controlled clinical trial," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(5), pages 333-345, September.
    7. Baltussen, Rob & Ament, Andre & Leidl, Reiner, 1996. "Making cost assessments based on RCTs more useful to decision-makers," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 163-183, September.
    8. Banta, David, 2003. "The development of health technology assessment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 121-132, February.
    9. Don Husereau & Anthony Culyer & Peter Neumann & Philip Jacobs, 2015. "How do Economic Evaluations Inform Health Policy Decisions for Treatment and Prevention in Canada and the United States?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 273-279, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:4:p:367-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.