IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v15y1995i3p240-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making Strategies for Telephone Triage in Emergency Medical Services

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Leprohon
  • Vimla L. Patel

Abstract

Decision-making strategies used by nurses in telephone triage involving public emergency calls for medical help were investigated as a function of task urgency and complexity in the real-world dynamic environment. The sample included 34 nurses as call receivers. Tran scripts of 50 nurse-client dialogues and 50 explanations of the decision-making process, elicited immediately after completion of the calls, were analyzed using methods of discourse and protocol analyses. In high-urgency situations, heuristic rules based on symptoms were used, and the decisions were mostly accurate. With the increase in problem complexity, more causal explanations were found, and the decisions were more often inaccurate. Fur thermore, the explanations supporting the accurate decisions were often inaccurate, showing a decoupling of knowledge and action. Alternate strategies were used in moderate- to low- urgency conditions, where contextual knowledge of the situations was exploited to identify the needs of the clients and to negotiate the best plan of action to meet these needs, resulting in more accurate decisions. Key words: clinical reasoning; cognitive models; context; decision making strategies; emergency medical services; intuition; nursing decision making; telephone triage; uncertainty. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:240-253)

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Leprohon & Vimla L. Patel, 1995. "Decision-making Strategies for Telephone Triage in Emergency Medical Services," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(3), pages 240-253, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:3:p:240-253
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9501500307
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9501500307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan Bond & Simon Cooper, 2006. "Modelling emergency decisions: recognition‐primed decision making. The literature in relation to an ophthalmic critical incident," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(8), pages 1023-1032, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:3:p:240-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.