IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v15y1995i3p231-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Patient Education on Decisions about Breast Cancer Treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Gretchen B. Chapman
  • Arthur S. Elstein
  • Katharine Kostbade Hughes

Abstract

The authors examined the effects of materials for educating patients about treatment options for breast cancer on knowledge about the disease, preferences for alternative treatments, and how changes in knowledge and preferences were related. Eighty-two undergraduate students acted as advisors to a hypothetical patient. They completed a knowledge test and rated their preferences for three options-breast-sparing surgery with radiation, mastectomy followed by reconstructive surgery, and mastectomy followed by use of a breast prosthesis— before and after viewing a videotape or a booklet version of the educational materials. Both formats increased knowledge scores. Treatment preferences were not affected by reading the booklet, but viewing the videotape resulted in a preference shift toward breast-sparing surgery. This media difference may be due to features of the video that were not reproduced in the booklet, such as interviews with other patients. Knowledge gains were uncorrelated with preference changes. Key words: patient decision making; patient education; breast cancer; educational technology; video; knowledge; preferences. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:231-239)

Suggested Citation

  • Gretchen B. Chapman & Arthur S. Elstein & Katharine Kostbade Hughes, 1995. "Effects of Patient Education on Decisions about Breast Cancer Treatments," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(3), pages 231-239, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:3:p:231-239
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9501500306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9501500306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas & J. Ivan Williams & Linda Levy & C.D. Naylor, 1996. "Using a Trade-off Technique to Assess Patients' Treatment Preferences for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 16(3), pages 262-272, August.
    2. Talya Salz & Noel T. Brewer, 2009. "Offering Chemotherapy and Hospice Jointly: One Solution to Hospice Underuse," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(4), pages 521-531, July.
    3. Sjaak Molenaar & Mirjam A.G. Sprangers & Fenna C.E. Postma-Schuit & Emiel J. Th. Rutgers & Josje Noorlander & Joop Hendriks & Hanneke C.J.M. De Haes, 2000. "Interpretive Review : Feasibility and Effects of Decision Aids," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 20(1), pages 112-127, January.
    4. Peep F.M. Stalmeier & Ivana J. Unic & Lia C.G. Verhoef & Willem A.J. Van Daal, 1999. "Evaluation of a Shared Decision Making Program for Women Suspected to Have a Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(3), pages 230-241, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:3:p:231-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.