IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v15y1995i1p65-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

You Can Lead a Horse to Water-Improving Physicians' Knowledge of Probabilities May Not Affect Their Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Roy M. Poses
  • Randall D. Cebul
  • Robert S. Wigton

Abstract

Objectives. To determine whether improving physicians' judgments of the probability of streptococcal pharyngitis for patients with sore throats would affect their use of antibiotics and affect the variation in such use. Design. Post-hoc retrospective analysis of data previously collected as part of a controlled trial. Settings. University student health services in Penn sylvania and Nebraska. Patients. Sequential patients with pharyngitis seen before and after the time clinicians received either an experimental educational intervention designed to improve probabilistic diagnostic judgments (at the Pennsylvania site) or a control intervention, a standard lecture (at the Nebraska site). The clinician-subjects were the primary case physicians practicing at either site. Measurements. Clinical variables prospectively recorded by the clinicians, probability assessments, and treatment decisions. Results. At the experi mental site, despite marked decreases in clinicians' overestimations of disease probability after the intervention, the proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics showed a trend toward increasing: 100/290 (34.5%) pre-intervention, 90/225 (40%) post-intervention. The interven tion did not decrease practice variation between individual doctors. Univariable and multi variable analyses showed no major change in the relationships between clinical variables and treatment decisions after the intervention. At the control site there was no major change in probability judgments or treatment decisions after the intervention. Conclusions. Teaching physicians to make better judgments of disease probability may not alter their treatment decisions. Key words: knowledge; probability; decision making; pharyngitis diagnosis. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:65-75)

Suggested Citation

  • Roy M. Poses & Randall D. Cebul & Robert S. Wigton, 1995. "You Can Lead a Horse to Water-Improving Physicians' Knowledge of Probabilities May Not Affect Their Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(1), pages 65-75, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:1:p:65-75
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9501500110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9501500110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marieke Huysentruyt & Daniel Read, 2008. "How do people value extended warranties?: Evidence from two field surveys," Department of Economics Working Papers 2008_02, Durham University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:15:y:1995:i:1:p:65-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.