IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v14y1994i4p369-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Disease Prevalence from Inaccurate Test Results

Author

Listed:
  • Mark I. Taragin
  • Daniel Wildman
  • Richard Trout

Abstract

Estimates of disease prevalence are needed for the interpretation of test results as well as for public health decisions. Assessing prevalence may be difficult if a definitive test is un available, impractical, or expensive. A formula derived from Bayes' theorem can calculate the prevalence of disease in a population by incorporating test results with a knowledge of the sensitivity and specificity of a test. This paper reviews this formula and provides examples evaluating the prevalence of HIV disease, the usefulness of ventilation-perfusion scans in diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and settings where screening tests should not be applied. These examples demonstrate that precise yet inexpensive estimates of disease prevalence are possible by enhancing the usefulness of an inaccurate test. Key words: Bayes' theorem; prevalence; statistics. (Med Decis Making 1994;14:369-373)

Suggested Citation

  • Mark I. Taragin & Daniel Wildman & Richard Trout, 1994. "Assessing Disease Prevalence from Inaccurate Test Results," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 14(4), pages 369-373, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:14:y:1994:i:4:p:369-373
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9401400407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9401400407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9401400407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:14:y:1994:i:4:p:369-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.