IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v13y1993i2p118-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multiattribute-utility-function Approach to Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Pharmaceutical Agents

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart Eriksen
  • L. Robin Keller

Abstract

Both the selection of doses of pharmaceutical agents and comparisons between pharma ceutical agents have long been based on the nonquantified concept of the risk-benefit ratio. Though useful, this concept implies a data comparison that is difficult to make: the toxicity versus the efficacy of a drug compound. This research demonstrates an approach for weigh ing risks and benefits by combining utility functions for human efficacy and toxicity with animal and laboratory toxicity information to develop an overall multiattribute utility function for an ophthalmic pharmaceutical agent, I-bunolol, intended for the treatment of glaucoma. With this multiattribute function and a small portion of the published data available for this drug, the expected utilities for six doses (including a control) could be compared and the value of this approach in drug-dosage selection demonstrated. Key words: decision analysis; expected utility; dosage selection; compound comparison; pharmaceutical decision; mul tiattribute utility; risk-benefit ratio. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:118-125)

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart Eriksen & L. Robin Keller, 1993. "A Multiattribute-utility-function Approach to Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Pharmaceutical Agents," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 13(2), pages 118-125, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:13:y:1993:i:2:p:118-125
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9301300205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9301300205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralph L. Keeney & Rakesh K. Sarin & Robert L. Winkler, 1984. "Analysis of Alternative National Ambient Carbon Monoxide Standards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 518-528, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bleichrodt, Han, 1995. "QALYs and HYEs: Under what conditions are they equivalent?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 17-37, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralph L. Keeney, 2002. "Common Mistakes in Making Value Trade-Offs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(6), pages 935-945, December.
    2. James E. Smith & Detlof von Winterfeldt, 2004. "Anniversary Article: Decision Analysis in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 561-574, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:13:y:1993:i:2:p:118-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.