IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v12y1992i4p280-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproducibility of Predictor Variables from a Validated Clinical Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Paul S. Heckerling
  • Roger C. Conant
  • Thomas G. Tape
  • Robert S. Wigton

Abstract

It has been suggested that clinical prediction rules are not reproducible, and that the most important variables frequently do not appear in replicate models. The authors studied the reproducibility of a validated rule for predicting radiographic evidence of pneumonia (ROC areas for the training and validation cohorts, 0.816 and 0.821, respectively). Two hundred replicate samples of size 250 and size 500 were generated by sampling without replacement from the original training cohort of 905 patients with a 14.6% prevalence of pneumonia. Forward selection was performed among 31 candidate variables by stepwise logistic regres sion. Using as reproducibility criteria: 1) inclusion of all five variables from the original model in the original order; 2) inclusion of all five variables in any order; 3) inclusion of the first three variables; 4) inclusion of the first two variables; 5) inclusion of the first variable; and 6) inclusion of any of the five variables: 2.5%, 13.5%, 48.5%, 85.5%, 98.0%, and 100% of replicate models of sample size 500, respectively, met the criteria, whereas 0%, 0%, 16.5%, 49.0%, 71.5%, and 97.5% of models of sample size 250 met the criteria (all comparisons by sample size p

Suggested Citation

  • Paul S. Heckerling & Roger C. Conant & Thomas G. Tape & Robert S. Wigton, 1992. "Reproducibility of Predictor Variables from a Validated Clinical Rule," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 12(4), pages 280-285, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:12:y:1992:i:4:p:280-285
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9201200406
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9201200406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:12:y:1992:i:4:p:280-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.