Author
Abstract
In the analysis and presentation of diagnostic relationships by means of conventional multiple logistic regression, the following limitations occur. 1) the model starts not from the prior disease odds but from the posterior disease odds for all test variables having a zero value, 2) apart from the odds ratio, other test characteristics cannot be read from the model ; 3) the sequence of entering of terms is guided by pure statistical criteria and not primarily by the criterion gain in certainty; 4) interactions are not very comprehensibly represented and are difficult to interpret. A method dealing with these limitations with respect to the analysis of data on the relationships between binary tests and disease outcome is described. Essential is the transformation of any test variable x to (x - x 0 ), where x 0 is that specific (virtual) value of x so that: posterior disease odds = prior disease odds, and consequently LR x0 = 1 Moreover, a simple branching structure is introduced while the terms are entered in order of decreasing gain in certainty. Examples are given for one-, two-, and three-test situations with and without dependency and interaction of tests, and general formulas are presented. For situations with the same prior probability, and the same overall discrimination of the separate test variables, all equations clearly have a common basis. Inclusion of new variables does not affect coefficients previously included in the model, and terms without a significant contribution can be skipped without affecting other coefficients. Standard errors and confi dence intervals of test characteristics can be computed using the BMDP® LR program. Further study needs to be done on the inclusion of continuous variables and cost-benefit aspects, and comparison with the performance of the CART ® program. Key words logistic regression, Bayes' theorem; dependency; Interaction, sequence, multiple testing. (Med Decis Making 1992; 12:93-108)
Suggested Citation
J. André Knottnerus, 1992.
"Application of Logistic Regression to the Analysis of Diagnostic Data,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 12(2), pages 93-108, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:medema:v:12:y:1992:i:2:p:93-108
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200202
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:12:y:1992:i:2:p:93-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.