IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v12y1992i2p142-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost - Effectiveness of Prophylactic AZT Following Neediestick Injury in Health Care Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Scott D. Ramsey
  • Mary D. Nettleman

Abstract

In response to health care workers' concerns about contracting infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the workplace, several institutions now offer prophylactic azido-deoxythymidine (AZT) for needlesticks sustained while exposed to HIV-infected pa tients. The authors designed a model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of AZT prophylaxis. If AZT were 100% effective, prophylaxis would cost $2,388 per life-year gained and $66,876 per life saved using a societal perspective. For each $100 increase in the cost of AZT, the cost per life-year saved increased $1,190. Reducing the efficacy of AZT to 75, 50, and 25% raised the costs per life-year gained to $3,184, $4,775, and $9,551, respectively If AZT were given for all needlesticks without regard to the HIV status of the source, the costs of prophylaxis would rise substantially. It is concluded that AZT, if moderately effective, can be cost-effective as a prophylactic agent but only if used in instances where the source is known to have an HIV infection. Key words. human immunodeficiency virus, azido-deoxy thymidine ; cost-effectiveness; needlesticks. (Med Decis Making 1992;12:142-148)

Suggested Citation

  • Scott D. Ramsey & Mary D. Nettleman, 1992. "Cost - Effectiveness of Prophylactic AZT Following Neediestick Injury in Health Care Workers," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 12(2), pages 142-148, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:12:y:1992:i:2:p:142-148
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9201200207
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9201200207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Briggs & Mark Sculpher, 1995. "Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: A review of published studies," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(5), pages 355-371, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:12:y:1992:i:2:p:142-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.