IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v11y1991i4_supplps2-s14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Informatics and Clinical Decision Making: The Science and the Pragmatics

Author

Listed:
  • Edward H. Shortliffe

Abstract

There are important scientific and pragmatic synergies between the medical decision making field and the emerging discipline of medical informatics. In the 1970s, the field of medicine forced clinically oriented artificial intelligence (AI) researchers to develop ways to manage explicit statements of uncertainty in expert systems. Classic probability theory was considered and discussed, but it tended to be abandoned because of complexities that limited its use. In medical AI systems, uncertainty was handled by a variety of ad hoc models that simulated probabilistic considerations. To illustrate the scientific interactions between the fields, the author describes recent work in his laboratory that has attempted to show that formal normative models based on probability and decision theory can be practically melded with AI methods to deliver effective advisory tools. In addition, the practical needs of decision makers and health policy planners are increasingly necessitating collaborative efforts to develop a computing and communications infrastructure for the decision making and informatics communities. This point is illustrated with an example drawn from outcomes management research.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward H. Shortliffe, 1991. "Medical Informatics and Clinical Decision Making: The Science and the Pragmatics," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(4_suppl), pages 2-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:4_suppl:p:s2-s14
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101104s02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9101104s02
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9101104s02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curtis P. Langlotz & Edward H. Shortliffe & Lawrence M. Fagan, 1988. "A Methodology for Generating Computer-based Explanations of Decision-theoretic Advice," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(4), pages 290-303, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael P. Wellman & Mark H. Eckman & Craig Fleming & Sharon L. Marshall & Frank A. Sonnenberg & Stephen G. Pauker, 1989. "Automated Critiquing of Medical Decision Trees," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 9(4), pages 272-284, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:4_suppl:p:s2-s14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.